Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Was Darwin a Socialist?

Given that Charles Darwin was a contemporary of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, is there any credence to the speculation that Darwin’s Theory of Evolution was driven by socialism?

By: Ringo Bones

After reading A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution and Cooperation by Peter Singer a few years ago, I can – with utmost confidence – safely conclude that any intrusion of ideology, religious or otherwise, into science is an invitation to wishful thinking. But given that in contemporary America – when the conservative White Anglo-Saxon rhetoric now leans toward xenophobia – can Charles Darwin be properly considered as a true socialist?

Unfortunately, White conservative xenophobic America refers to anything that they don’t like – i.e. corporate social responsibility, ethical business governance – as socialism. Even Conservapedia – the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant’s conservative version of Wikipedia – had been busy “redefining” the good works done by Jesus Christ 2,000 or so years ago that could be misconstrued as Marxist-Leninist Socialism in Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh era White America of today. Which could only give Dan Brown a bottomless creative wellspring for another The DaVinci Code-type sequel. And given the fact that Peter Singer wrote most of A Darwinian Left during the economically prosperous paradise of the Clinton Administration, can it still be used as research material to prove whether Charles Darwin embraced socialism when he was still alive?

The “official” historical accounts of Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is that Darwin tried as hard as he can to make his newly discovered “plasticity of species” phenomena shoehorn into the prevailing Victorian zeitgeist of the Christian-based Creationist view of his wife. And the historically documented political upheaval in Europe during the very end of the 19th Century often points out that those extolling the virtues of Marx and Engels’ ideology often uses Darwin’s Theory of Evolution to show that socialism / communism is “natural” because it is how nature works. Which make Darwin’s Theory of Evolution the driving influence of socialism / communism from a mere ideology to grow into a “newfangled” way to run a state. But can this “convoluted” truth really be that self-evident?

During Victorian times – as well as today’s conservative White Anglo-Saxon American current fascination with the atheist writer Ayn Rand – cooperation is often viewed as an unabashed manifestation of socialism / communism. While competition to better one’s social and economic is everyone’s birthright in an ethical system established by organized Christianity in what is often referred to as the Protestant Work Ethic. Something that is often rationalized by mankind’s dominion over nature because of our divinely ordained status that looks kind of arcane from a scientific viewpoint and nothing more than an excuse to separate ourselves from nature. Given that mankind had now reached a point that competition had created a problem that threatens to kill us all – i.e. global warming and while our only salvation is cooperation through establishing binding treaties to curb greenhouse gas emissions – hints of socialism. Does this prove that Mother Nature wants mankind to embrace socialism in order for us to save from ourselves?

Maybe communism got such a bad rep when Lenin knowing he won’t be alive for much longer introduced the ideology in a traumatic way to most of the unsuspecting Russian populace. But is this historical event repeating itself when it is Mother Nature who is now forcing us to embrace communism or suffer from runaway greenhouse effect? Maybe the failure of the recent 2009 Copenhagen Climate Conference is a sure sign of this. Unfortunately, given that the loudest voices who are currently defining what is, what isn’t or should be communism / socialism are the White Anglo-Saxon conservative xenophobes of America, communism / socialism could turn from a mere ideology into the law of nature. Something Charles Darwin for all intents and purposes overlooked when Marx and Engels first published their communist manifesto back in February 1848.

1 comment:

  1. Who ever wrote this article has no idea what they are talking about. Just the idea of Ayn Rand being associated with socialism or communism is very wrong. Any Rand essentially believed the opposite of those. The libertarian (free market) ideology or the Austrian School of economic thought as economists refer to it.